"Lower Decks" is More Solidly Curated “Trek” Content

If you haven’t seen the sponsored posts and the PR drip feed did you know there is another Star Trek show called Lower Decks? It takes its name from an episode of TNG that was thoughtful and kinda heartbreaking when the lead guest character sacrificed her life for a shot to prove herself and sure I guess that’s fine for an animated comedy where the lead character gets hysterically suckled by a slobbering space spider beast.

It’s hard to know what to say about any of this that I haven’t thought or said or that other people haven’t thought or said - that this isn’t storytelling anymore, its just content to keep people’s eyeballs glued to and wallets wide open for CBS to pretend like it has anchor franchise, even though I’m reasonably convinced it’s the same few hundred thousand people - maybe a cool mil? - watching Trek in any incarnation these days. Who would know though, because no streaming service shares numbers - 30 million people watching a minute of a thing equals RECORDS SMASHED AS *SERVICE* DEBUTS MOST WATCHED FILM EVER so maybe Trek is huge, I just can’t tell - who can?

But I do know that Lower Decks is not exciting or new, it is fan service served replicator-perfect warm. There hasn’t been exciting or new Star Trek since Deep Space Nine, a show that had some great people behind it and truly built its own worlds with complex antagonists, new civilizations (remember those?), deep characters with challenging points of view. It used the Star Trek toolkit to tell timeless stories, and was as unconcerned as possible with how many of its in-universe elements translated into easy merch opportunities (no Ops playset for you, twelve-year-old me). It was also a TV series that ended, thank god it ended, and I remain ever grateful that if you ignore the Section 31 graverobbing no one has bothered trying to revisit it or convince a septuagenarian Avery Brooks that what fans really want is to see an entire series about old Sisko with a hard-drinkin’ new crew and there’s beheadings and eye gouging and Romulan siblings asking each other who they’ve fucked.

I grew up with this stuff, which somehow means Trek is umbilically linked to my core being and also talking about things without seeing them is shitty so here I am watching Lower Decks. But outside of some quick laughs, the pilot of this show - definitely like Picard, kinda like Discovery, a little less like Short Treks - just isn’t enough fun. Trek’s current powers that be talk a good game about how we need it more than ever because TRUMP and everything sucks right now. And yeah - they’re probably right, in as much as there’s nothing like great, inspiring, aspirational art to help you through tough times. But that’s not what any of this era of the franchise is. Until someone at the helm can chart a course for something beyond brand expansion uber alles, Star Trek is just another length of the unceasingly dark tunnel we’re all navigating right now, instead of the light guiding us through.

5. Rabbit Rona Requiem

As Covid-19 has transformed everything, so to has it transformed visiting the emergency vet - except, this, perhaps, for the better. For rabbit parents, the critter ER usually means hours spent in cool, sterile rooms, waiting for the only doctor in the vicinity who knows anything about rabbits to work through their backlog of emergencies until they get to you. Now, thanks to Covid, all you have to do is hand over your bun at the front door, then wait for a prognosis in your car in air-conditioned, chair-reclined comfort, or perhaps during a jaunty stroll around the clinic.

I learned this weeks ago, while taking our dwarf rabbit, Willy, to the exotic vet emergency room in Bothell. Earlier in the day, I walked in to check on him and his bonded bun mate, Holly, only to find Willy laying down awkwardly on his side, little grey legs propped on his food dish. When I approached, his typically spry hop to his feet failed him; instead his legs flailed on the ground. Our normal vet couldn’t see him until Friday, so I quickly packed him in the carrier and raced up to Bothell, the only other emergency clinic for rabbits in the area.

In five years of joint rabbit ownership, I’ve learned they’re more sophisticated than other exotics, but far more subtle than a dog or a cat. They communicate, um, sparingly, and what they do say is hard to pick-up on without focused attention. A head tilt or even just being huddled in a loaf in a different part of the cage could be a warning sign, but it could also be nothing.

Keeping Willy healthy was a top priority, if not only for his own sake, then for Holly’s. Rabbits don’t have to have a partner, but they do love it. She’d already outlived two “husbuns” in the last five years, and we had no desire to see her a widow for a third time. Plus, we’re as sure as we could be that if she had to pick a favorite mate, it’d be Willy. With a grumpy disposition and general indifference toward humans, he didn’t do a ton for us, but he made a perfect foil for Holly - she energetic, bouncy, vivacious; he solid, sturdy, grouchy. The first time they laid together in a scattered pile of hay, I swear you could’ve popped a tiny cigarette in her mouth, so much did she have the air of a satisfied lover.

Upon arrival and mask on, I handed Willy over at the front door of the clinic, then went back to wait in the car. I thought about Holly’s previous lover, Gus, who got us used to a consistent routine with the bunny vet - long wait, nurse assistant dicussion, long wait, doctor’s exam, long wait, more exams, pay up and head home. Gus had a raft of health issues; kidney problems, infections, constantly peeing on himself and stinking up the living room. We learned a lot with Gus and went to extremes to keep him healthy. At one point near his end, we were injecting him daily with subcutaneous fluids, in addition to a full course of antibiotics and force feeding him “Critical Care” rabbit nutrition. No matter what was wrong with Willy, I knew he wasn’t nearly as miserable as Gus had been.

The doc called about an hour after handing Willy over; their best guess was that he had fractured his arm and they recommended radiology to be sure, which also required anesthesia. Now, if you’re thinking that assembling a team of emergency animal docs to gas a two pound rabbit, put him under, and take x-rays seems insane, let me assure you you’re not alone. Still, taking care of Holly’s man came first. I gave a very expensive go-ahead and the doc told me to grab dinner; they’d call me when they finished.

I drove aimlessly around Bothell while the sun fell through the pine trees. Signs of life intermingled with signs of the pandemic; boarded up windows next to newly re-opened restaurants and some nearly full patios. A long line of people waited at a fast food window six feet apart, few of them wearing masks; a dissonance of the times.

Ravenous after hours of driving, waiting, I landed at Taco Time. After paying at the window, I noticed that the only employee not wearing a mask was putting the tacos together on the line. She caught me staring and I contemplated shouting at her, refusing my food and demanding a refund. But, my will power, it turns out, was no less confused than the line I’d just driven past, and I devoured everything in the bag.

On the road again, aimless and impatient, I wanted to hear from the doc and learn how to implement whatever crazy solution they proposed to keep our little rabbit’s limb in one piece, and get home. As I turned around to head back to the clinic, the bluetooth display finally lit up - it was the doc, and she had a question.

“Is this a good time?”

The real point there, of course, is not to actually know if the timing was convenient - she had to tell me what she had to tell me. But I appreciated the opportunity to brace myself for what came next thanks to the heavier tone of her voice, a slightly slower pace to her words.

Willy wouldn’t be coming home after all. His limb wasn’t just fractured. The scans revealed bone cancer which had spread to his lungs. The vet offered to send him home with pain meds to make him comfortable, but that just gave me flashbacks to Gus. In his final days, we threw every medication we could at Gus to keep alive against all hope. All it did was turn what could have been a natural end into an excrutiating, protracted decline. By we finally took him to the vet for euthanasia, I’d watched him at work on our bunny cam (yes, we have a bunny cam) twitching so violently in his cage. I had no desire to see Willy suffer the same way.

The clinic, it turns out, has an exception to their Covid-19 entrance policy. They let you in to say goodbye. A rabbit doesn’t communicate with people like a dog or a cat, and, like I said, Willy didn’t seem to care about us all that much. Surprising, then, that I could feel tears welling while the vet assistant led me around the building to the back exam room with Willy. Somehow, much like the two buns before him, and after doing effectively nothing except eating and loving Holly, Willy had nonetheless become family.

Someday, someone could make a fortune by coming up with a better payment system for euthanasia. Asking for payment before they lethally inject your pet will never not be cruel, no matter how well trained the clinic staff is to ask with compassion. Money forked over, papers signed, I pet Willy in silence. He seemed perky still; another dissonance, knowing now that he was in pain, and likely had been for some time.

The vet offered to let me be there when they gave him the injections; one to put him to sleep, and one to “put him to sleep.” I mulled it quietly while I stroked his fur. In truth, I wanted to be there. If he was afraid, I didn’t want him to be alone. But, he’s also a rabbit, and that level of awareness was likely giving him too much credit. Moreover, I felt increasingly assured that, Willy’s limited emotive qualities aside, I would easily collapse if present with him in “the moment” and that level of vulnerability amongst strangers felt intolerable.

Intead, I committed another Covid sin, lowered my face mask in front of the nurse, and kissed him on the forehead. The nurse took him out in one state and brought him back fifteen minutes later in another, restless nose finally still.

Rabbits need to grieve for their mates, or so many say. Without the chance to see a mate’s body, the living mate may wonder endlessly where their partner went, get depressed, stop eating, and die. To help them through the process, it’s recommended you give the living mate closure by placing the deceased rabbit’s body in their cage, and give them time to realize they’re not coming back. It’s a grim ritual we’ve performed three times now. Once Holly has had a few hours to sniff around, she stands upright a few inches away from her mate’s body. It’s her sign. She’s had her chance to grieve, and lets us know she’s ready to move on.

We buried Willy in the back yard, like parents always do for kids as they learn the agony and ecstacy of small pet ownership (rabbits, btw - not great for kids), except he was ours. We cried a lot more and I felt a little ridiculous. Willy was a two pound fluff ball who lived only to please his bunny lover. So perhaps there’s a tiny reflection of some transitive quality of love at play; him to her, us to him. And in this time of prolonged physical isolation, we are also, more than ever, all we have. Those two pounds held a lot of weight.

4. Learnings from a Year and Change

A year ago, I frantically snapped photos as a person I’d never met held up my newborn son lion king style over the top of a curtain covering my wife’s tummy. I remember the doc behind me giving me the go-ahead to take pics with a loud “Now! Now!” and thinking how strange it was to be in a sterile operating room full of doctors in masks and gloves, wearing scrubs myself, but somehow taking pics on my bacteria-coated phone was OK.

But I sure am glad to have those photos now. I still look at those fresh-out-of-the womb pics a lot, thinking about how much has changed, but how much our little boy, now one year old, still seems like that tiny scrunchball, intermittently wailing and barely conscious, covered in weird goo.

20190309_060639.jpg

Parenting for a year has been massive and mundane, challenging and surprisingly instinctual. Honestly, I wish I could write something longer and more coherent about it all, but I have no grand, overarching lessons. And maybe that’s ok, because thinking about it in grand scope would bend my brain too much. Hell, I can’t even properly think about how to finish babyproofing this house (really gotta put something in front of the fireplace, like yesterday).

We take it a day at a time and it’s a lot of trial and error, adapting to change. Still though, I’ve learned a few things after a year of this, in no particular order:

  • Parenting is a ton of fun, except when it’s miserable, and it’s the most miserable when it’s terrifying, however infrequently. But ugh, the terror.

    Terror like the raft of complications he unknowingly caused on his way out of his mom’s belly. Or his innocent, doe-eyed stare in a restaurant high chair, not realizing he had glass shards stuck to his lips after biting into a water glass. Or that poorly worded call from the doctor’s office that left us in sweats for two days because we thought he was born with a rare, life-altering ailment (narrator: he wasn't). Freaky stuff, all.

  • Poop, puke, drool, screaming, crying, fussing? Honestly, bring it on. He laughs when I change a poopy diaper and, last I checked, baby laughter has curative powers matched only by penicillin.

  • I default to “kiddo” instead of “son” because somehow I always feel like “son” is going to turn me into emotional mush at any given moment.

  • Before him, I thought I’d never be one of those people who posted ad nauseam about their kids on social, including and especially those posts about your kid hitting a milestone each month. But yeah, here we are 12 months later and all his development minutiae is chronicled in-depth on my Insta feed. Powers of social media resistance are no match for a baby’s gap-toothed grin.

  • Time so rarely works in your favor - it’s too fast when you’re happy, achingly slow when bummed out - but even so, the pace with parenting is just different. The last year has been less linear, more like some weird Star Trek slipstream where you step through a portal, blink, and suddenly everyone’s in old age makeup and someone’s evolved into a weird lizard baby.

  • Also on those miserable times - they sure can bring out the worst in you. Sleep deprivation, physical exhaustion - it’s all added up to me probably saying things I regret, or snapping with a snarky comment, more times in the last year than the last 10 combined. So, apologize earnestly and often, I think is the takeaway there. It also helps to have….

  • …an amazing partner. My wife has given all of herself and more to our boy in the last year. Literally, figuratively, abstractly, concretely, daily, weekly, monthly - there’s no way to look at it where she’s put in anything less than 150%. She is my hero, though that was true before we had a child, too.

  • I will likely never do anything else so cool and meaningful as being his dad.

  • He is a perfect little thing.

processed_Calvin_Kessler_027.jpg

3. “Picard” Cranks the Gears at the Star Trek Content Factory

“Picard makes a decision which will be quite shocking to a lot of people,” said the great Patrick Stewart (pre-knighthood), referring not to his new show in 2020, but 1998's Star Trek: Insurrection. “Shocking” was generous— the big decision Picard made in that movie was resigning his Starfleet commission (sort of) for a few hours of movie time, during which he takes out some dopey looking bad guys while wearing slightly less-drab clothes. His uniform, ship, crew, commission, are all back before you know it.

Bless our beloved Sir Pat Stew now and forever, but I fear he’s too close to the franchise he’s largely defined for decades to know what’s “shocking” or, possibly, what’s exciting or good. The talking points on his PR tour for Picard have been consistent— some variant of “I wasn’t going to come back but the idea for the show was good enough to win me over” or “this isn’t the Picard you knew from TNG,” and so on. All of which sounds potentially cool and none of which is.

Is Picard bad? Not quite, if only ‘cuz there’s just enough good stuff to barely keep it afloat. Sir Pat Stew’s all-in performance as the aged Admiral Picard buoys a production otherwise sinking under the weight of cheesy villainy and Bourne-again action cliche. His Romulan sidekicks are neat and quiet moments with old friends even reach poignance.

But really, this is the same tale with Trek we’ve seen for the last decade — shows and movies earnestly produced, enthusiastically promoted, boringly written. Picard exists in a time when good and bad in Trek are effectively meaningless — the franchise’s last decade-plus is a wasteland of missed opportunities and empty storytelling. None of that matters, though, because the transmedia content engine keeps humming with warp-speed efficiency; PR tours, Short Treks, new shows, books, comics, social media, conventions all nakedly working in lock-step to send viewers into the gaping Doomsday Machine maw of CBS All Access, everyone’s 10th favorite streaming platform just 100 million subscribers shy of being a real boy.

Maybe Picard will get fun later, so far it’s damn dull. Another competent product of the “Star Trek Universe”—once a powerful device used to tell human stories, now producing stories to extend the empty life of a device.

Update July 22, 2020:

Everything I said above is true, except Patrick Stewart giving a good performance, and the idea of that performance being enough to keep the show from being bad. Sir Pat Stew was comfortable and hammy in this show, and it was definitely, 100% pure gold-pressed latinum bad.

2. RIcky Gervais is a Damn Bummer

The Office (U.K.) is the best written show ever about office life. Nothing else captures the pace of a corporate desk job - the quietness, the banality, the fun and the hopelessness - quite like those 14 perfectly crafted episodes of television.

I discovered The Office a couple years after it came out and quickly devoured the entire series. I watched it over and over again, studied the slang guide that came with the DVD, memorized the dialogue, and shared it with my friends. I also learned more about its creators, Stephen Merchant and especially Ricky Gervais.

For a while there, I felt the latter man could do no wrong. His stand-up specials at the time, Animals and Politics? Neither perfect, but both with flashes of brilliance (his Bible skewering in Animals still makes me chuckle). His children’s book series, Flanimals? I didn’t get it, but hey, kids books are fun. Extras? Brutal and brilliant.

I was a Gervais mega fan. And all of which is to say that, now Ricky Gervais bums me the f out.

I trace the change all the way back to the early aughts - a recap of an old interview I read between Gervais and a toxic nonsense man, Piers Morgan, after one of his early Golden Globes gigs, turned the tide for me. Faced with the criticism of his nastier jokes, the best he could offer was the ludicrously self-important assessment that his job as a comedian opening the country’s most meaningless awards show was to “make people think,” which carries a greater implication: when it comes to my “thinking man’s” jokes, “you just don’t get it.”

That finger pointing outward, never in, is now the dominant theme of his public persona. He’s not transphobic, you just don’t get the jokes. “Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right.” “Apologizing is the end of satire,” and so it goes. He couldn’t even start his Globes monologue this year without a defensiveness offensive: “Remember they’re just jokes,” he told the audience, proudly doing his part to perpetuate every bully’s favorite notion that attempted humor begets moral absolution.

And that monologue - what a mess. Did I chuckle? Sure. Jokes about the Grand Canyon between the ages of Leo and his girlfriends are always fun; I’m here for an Epstein reference any day. Plenty didn’t work, too - “you work for Amazon and Apple so you’d work for ISIS” doesn’t track, and his “take your award and get the f off the stage” line at the end is um…not a joke?

Worst, though, is the sanctimonious way he treats his approach to the gig. I think Hollywood is as silly as anyone, but let’s drive a stake through the heart of the idea that Hollywood liberals are so out of control that roasting them once a year at a glitzy party is a righteous crusade. If you really hate Hollywood, I have some content subscriptions I recommend you cancel and an award show with an obnoxious host I suggest you don’t tune into every year. Otherwise, maybe just enjoy the show and worry more about our planet burning to a crisp before our very eyes.

Gervais has created great stuff and does admirable things too - his animal advocacy in particular stands out for me. But no matter which way he spins it, there’s no ignoring that in the face of people suggesting “you can’t say whatever you want because it hurts people” his response is “your problem, not mine.” And so, in spite of so much brilliant contribution, it’s harder and harder to unsee another powerful white dude asked for better, and predictably unwilling to rise to the occasion.

1 a. Why am I numbering all these posts?

A belated resolution: Write 52 things - one thing per week, give or take - in 2020.

The last four years have been a terrific journey in continuing to write for other organizations, people, but it’s been ages since I wrote for me. This year, I’ve challenged myself to do so on a weekly basis.

I make no claims to quality, subject matter, or enlightenment. Only that it be some roughly complete thought with at least 100 words, and about something that won’t get me fired.

Since I only just posted something on Monday, I’m already behind, so join me on this journey for much more to come soon, and then with middling regularity once I’m caught up.

1. Therapy

I am in therapy - the talk a lot about your thoughts & feelings kind - and have been for 15 odd years.

I started therapy because I couldn’t stop torpedoing romantic relationships in college. Not inherently a major problem, but breaking things off with promising relationship after relationship for no clear reason really started to mess with my head.

That was just the trigger though - I felt major anxiety throughout middle and high school; depression almost as long as I can remember. Why? Hard to pinpoint exactly, but some potent mix of divorced parents, weird role-modeling, schoolyard bullying, that sort of thing. The interest from all that compounded, and brought me to some pretty strange, occasionally dark places in my late teens, early to mid-20’s. Therapy was the way out.

OK - wait a second, all of that is sort of starting at the end.

But better that way maybe - be quick, get it out of the way - with something so awkward (unnecessarily so!) to bring up. In truth, I’d talk about it more often but: a.) (relatively) no one talks about therapy, and b.) it’s just so goddamn mundane. The emotional fallout from life’s microtragedies is a snooze. And the process? Two white guys talking about feelings for a 50 minutes a week, one of them (um, not the other guy) rambling or crying as the emotional occasion demands? Bring a book.

Also though, when I think about what I cherish most in my life now, there’s no way it happened - or at least happened as well, without therapy. Indeed, I can’t think of anything else, particularly pre-marriage, that made such a profound impact in my life (and also made married life a possibility).

Thus, “I am in therapy.” I will be for the foreseeable future (though I’m grateful these days to be in a place where therapy is much less about triage, and more about upkeep and improvement). Want to talk about therapy more? I’m down, and - fair warning - could probably go on at length.

And, lastly, two broad things (with smaller things inside the broad things) I’ve learned:

One: It’s a relative few who really emerge from childhood with the tools necessary to process emotions in a healthy way. The rest of us pay for it later - whether it’s therapy, medication, or some real hard knocks and learning. Also, would wager that most who deny they need it, probably do.

Two: Love is a powerful curative (the best), but its even better as a vaccine. I’ve done a lot of work to be kinder, more respectful to myself, but judgment, negativity, shame - it’s all habit hard to break, particularly as months turn to years turn to decades. For better results, judge less, open up more, love yourself and others early and often.

Are those obvious platitudes blasted a million tweets per day into the wellnessphere, all easier said than done? Sure. But, as therapy always reminds me, don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good, nor profound the enemy of the useful, or of progress.

A Reminder to Pursue the Stop and Chat

Someone I'd known since childhood just passed away far too soon. Details are pending and making anything google searchable is always risky, so hence his forthcoming anonymity.

It’s actually hard to think about my relationship with this friend without acknowledging a beginning when we were kind of dicks to each other - trading insults, some weak attempts at physical posturing. That was middle school, though, and everyone’s a dick in middle school when we’re less human, more just confused, kid-shaped vessels of bubbling hormones, competing for safety in the pack.

Of course, part of the beauty of growing up is recognizing that everyone experiences their own misery in those years. Hopefully, it passes, and if you're so inclined you get to appreciate the person underneath.

I remember him most from band – he played trombone, but was gleefully loud whether he had instrument up to his mouth or not. Particularly in high school, pep band I think, he’d give me props if I did something cool playing the drums, and we’d share some laughs every now and again. We didn’t have much in common, but, after the struggles to get along in middle school, he turned out to be a surprisingly fun dude. He was popular, more so than me. The people I liked most liked him, and anyone cool enough for them was definitely good enough for me.

I barely saw him after high school. We connected on Facebook at some point, but never talked. The next I’d see him was our 10-year reunion. The great joy of that occasion was the evaporation of boundaries, the equanimity between formerly divided cliques and classes. The sense that so much of the drama and B.S. of school was just silliness and it’s ten years later and fuck it – let’s just all have a beer together and laugh. He manned the bar and probably should’ve cut me off because I got absolutely blasted. But god damn it was a great party and he imbued it with pulsing, boisterous life, pouring drink after drink, driving conversation.

A few years later when visiting my family, I took my wife – then my girlfriend – to a local dive. She was born and raised in Manhattan, and I wanted her to experience a proper slice of life from my hometown, cowboy boots and rodeo talk and all.

I saw him there, across the bar. He and I did that thing where you make eye contact real quick and then look away and pretend not to see each other. He had people around him; maybe he wanted to stay engaged with them. Or maybe a ‘stop-and-chat’ with an old high school friend seemed like too much effort, and, like I said, true closeness always eluded us.

When I consider it now, I think I felt too nervous to talk to him, too afraid of rejection of even a mild display of Cro-Magnon affection. I liked him, I admired his fearlessness with people in ways that I’m fearful. I wanted to introduce him to the woman who would become my wife. But with his booming laughter, in his element surrounded by friends, he still seemed popular and I felt the echoes of being a downcast, insecure teen.

I wish that I had dug a just a little bit deeper, and found the courage to talk that night. We grew up, if not quite together, then something close to it, intersecting with each other's lives off and on since childhood. Even if just a handshake and best wishes until the next reunion, he wouldn’t have suffered for a moment of camaraderie, and we all deserve a reminder when we are good people in each other’s eyes.

See-ya Twitter, You’re the Worst

Update: Surprise surprise, this didn't last! I'm back on Twitter and still can't stand it.

As with so much, but especially with this topic, the post below reflects only my opinions.

Others have written more comprehensively on the state of Twitter, how it’s a cesspool of yelling, mansplaining, race-baiting, filter-bubbling hate. I have little more to add, other than to say they’re all right, Twitter is just so much terrible, and I'm out.

It’s the little things that all tallied-up like poison “likes” (or is it “loves” the same way every brand co-opts “love”?). The profiles with statements like “I WAKE UP HAPPY EVERY DAY KNOWING THAT DEMS DON'T.” (Actual “about me” section!). Or my first time being told I was a miserable cuck who should’ve been incinerated in a concentration camp oven for criticizing a presidential candidate, only to have Twitter tell me it wasn’t hate. And then there’s the toxic, artificially-colored elephant in the room, spitting out an endless verbal pestilence 140 characters at-a-time that has the fun side effect of making the planet’s collective knees buckle with nuclear anxiety.

Nope, no hate here.

Nope, no hate here.

Why is Twitter this way? Who the hell knows anymore? Does it even matter? Free speech is actually "Free Speech," which means it still has limits and also that no private organization has to allow any speech they don’t like on their platforms. But they do out of some misplaced sense of righteousness, or naivete, or, more cynically, a knowledge that they need user eyeballs to assault with promoted posts and nothing’s more important than GROWTH, no matter if it’s healthy or just metastasis.

Or maybe, just maybe, no one thought it through, no one had the foresight to think that Twitter should be better than an all-day every-day release for our collective ids, to say “Hey, maybe we should regulate our digital lives with a modicum of the discipline we show in our physical lives. Supercuts doesn’t let you throw F-bombs at each other while you wait, let’s take a cue from Supercuts on this one.” Hell, at a cosmic level, this is all still just digital communication pre-pubescence, maybe adolescence will bring some semblance of sanity. (Wait, I remember adolescence, soooo maybe not.)

I used to love Twitter – microblogging in 140 characters? How fun! What a creative challenge! My first live-tweeting was a thrill – so many likes and mentions! And some organizations have used it to great effect, to help their businesses, to deliver breaking news, to stir grand revolution, to create the most-liked inspirational tweet of all time – all hip hooray! But my following is small, I’m not running a business, I don’t need to see breaking news tweets before they’re deleted and replaced with more accurate breaking news tweets.

At best, Twitter is trying to fix their hate problem and succeeding at the achingly slow pace set by many major American institutions. At worst, they don’t care, and I imagine the truth is a combination of it all – freedom of expression and the needs of a business forging new territory are hard to reconcile. In any event, it doesn’t particularly matter. There are other feeds fighting for my eyeshare and other sources of online toxicity to repel. Good riddance Twitter. You’ve been the worst.

Is Colbert Too Narcissistic for Mainstream America?

Ratings and results from a survey published this week suggest that Stephen Colbert’s left-leaning politics may be alienating middle-America viewers from his new Late Show on CBS. That may well be true, but said alienation could also run even deeper than politics. Despite being on a different network and not playing his old Colbert Report “character” any more, Colbert’s Late Show is still extremely focused on him, and heavily leverages the cult of personality he established back at Comedy Central. Which begs the question, if you’re not into him already, what exactly is going to beckon you in to the Cult of Colbert?

Looking back at Colbert’s body of work, the self-centric nature of his writing and performance well predates the Report, extending all the way to Strangers With Candy, his wicked after-school special satire written with pals Amy Sedaris and Paul Dinello in the early 2000’s. On Strangers, every character is self-obsessed to the point of grotesquery. Colbert’s sourpuss history teacher, Chuck Noblet, lambasts Sedaris’ depressed 40-something high school student after her father is ripped apart by rabid dogs (seriously, it’s a weird-ass show) not because he’s concerned about her well-being, but because she’s disrupting his class. Dinello’s white male art-teacher stakes a claim on all the trauma from a hate crime committed against black students — and it basically goes on like that for 30 episodes. It’s easy to observe seeds of the me-ness that would define Colbert’s future here, and while Strangers is gleefully subversive satire, it’s also hardly inviting.

The Colbert Report eliminated the meanness of Strangers, but amped the Colbert-as-narcissist element to 1 — to much more successful returns than Strangers. What started as a Daily Show companion spoof of bloviating punditry became a conceit through which Colbert could freely imbue every facet of his show with his passions and peeves. If you watched the Report, you know not only that Colbert satirizes conservative media, but that Colbert loves to sing, Colbert has a deep relationship with his faith, Colbert can quote the Lord of the Rings appendices backwards, Colbert hates bears, and so on.

Audiences ate it up. Through Colbert and his thin but sturdy conservative disguise, the viewer got to vicariously experience the rarest of gifts — a free license to be unabashedly self-celebratory in front of a national audience. It helped that he had the sharpest writing around, and always used his powers for good, so long as it didn’t conflict with the conservative goals of his character (see: his devotion to charity, his shows for the troops in Iraq, the heartrending tribute to his deceased mother). Rarely, though, has a show been so defined by sheer force of personality, and one ostensibly focused so inward, at that.

Now, though, the context has changed. Colbert is on a big-three network and the conceit of the self-obsessed blowhard has been put to rest. But, the approach to his show seems largely similar. The audience is still encourages to chant his name relentlessly at the top of every show; the Ed Sullivan theater is adorned with his face everywhere; recurring bits still have self-referencing names like “Stephen Colbert Gets All Up in Your Faith.” Even last week’s interview with Jane Fonda largely relied on the insular knowledge of their previous encounters on the Report. If you’re middle America, new to Colbert and discovering him for the first time on CBS, it’s not hard to imagine asking what the hell is going on, why is this guy’s name all over everything, and why should I care?

Colbert’s relentless self-promotion has taken him as high as he can likely go. He‘s gone from a barely-watched show on a network with a niche liberal audience to the most-watched network in America. But as the new late-night establishment settles in and the pressure mounts on Colbert to meet the ratings burdens of a more mainstream network, can he figure out how to let the rest of America in on the joke that is the Cult of Colbert? Or, is it simply time to tell some new jokes, instead?

Why Splitting Mad Men's Final Season In Half Was a Terrible Idea

Long goodbyes suck, and Mad Men's had one of the longest goodbyes a TV show has received in recent memory. People scoffed when AMC announced their decision to pull a Breaking Bad and cleave Mad Men's final season in two, and rightly so. Widely dismissed as a move to maximize the show's Emmy and awards potential by drawing out the final thirteen eps across two years instead of one, even series creator Matthew Weiner seemed to think it was a bad idea, only stating at the time that he "found a way to work with it." 

With Mad Men finally at a close, it's possible to look back and see just how inappropriate the seventh-season split really was. Unlike Breaking Bad, which worked with an increased episode count to turn it's final season into two, separately filmed "mini-seasons", Mad Men treated the season more like business as usual, and the difference is palpable. Where Breaking Bad ended season 5.0 on a breathless cliffhanger, Mad Men ended season 7.0 with "Waterloo" and the death of Bert Cooper. It's a beautiful ep, but more or less similar to, albeit a highlight of, the rest of this season of languid, thoughtful goodbyes. 

Watching through season 7.5 and hoping for closure with everyone's favorite relationships and characters, it's easy to forget just how much closure already came in 7.0. Bert's aforementioned death, Don and Peggy's slow dance, the dysfunctional SC&P family dinner at Burger Chef. All these moments should have built momentum into Mad Men's final hours (as they have every season) but instead, it feels like eons ago, and season 7.5 felt burdened with undue slack to pick up as a result.  

Goodbyes, especially with the one's you're close to, are best kept short and deliberate - a peck on the check, a firm hug, and a fond farewell - but Mad Men's sunset season held on like an endless, too-needy embrace. Hopefully, in the future, AMC realizes that's no way to end a relationship with something you love.